A US judge withdrew his decision in a biopharma securities case after lawyers discovered AI-generated errors, including fake quotes and misstated case outcomes.
Key Takeaways:
- The judge's decision highlighted the increasing use of AI tools in legal research, which can lead to errors like AI hallucinations.
- This incident is not isolated, as other high-profile cases have revealed AI-generated errors in legal filings, such as ChatGPT-assisted citations.
- The use of AI tools in law is not reliable, and human oversight is still necessary to ensure accuracy and validity
Google's new feature in Veo 3: you can now draw your instructions on the first frame, and Veo follows them. Instead of iterating endlessly on the perfect prompt, you can just draw it out like you would for a human artist.
Trump’s Anti-Bias AI Order Is Just More Bias
[N] PapersWithCode sunsets, new HuggingFace Papers UI
Will AI accelerate a pathway towards Neo-Feudalism?
Is it just me or do AI chats completely ignore time?
80+ AI tools to finish months of work in minutes.
Why is Reddit so against AI?